KRUX
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
KRUX, an immersive case study competition organized in collaboration with Masters’ Union, provided participants with a unique opportunity to engage with real-world business scenarios. Designed to challenge students' strategic thinking, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative skills, the event drew aspiring entrepreneurs, business students, and future venture capitalists to test their knowledge and decision-making capabilities. The competition spanned multiple key business domains, including finance, strategy, marketing, human resources, public relations, and commerce, ensuring a well-rounded experience for all participants.
KRUX was not just another case study competition; it was a platform that simulated the high-stakes environment of real-world business decision-making. Participants were required to step into the shoes of industry leaders, tackling complex business problems and proposing innovative solutions. Unlike traditional academic case competitions, KRUX emphasized dynamic, real-time problem-solving where adaptability and quick thinking played crucial roles. The event encouraged students to collaborate, think strategically, and develop solutions that could have actual business implications.
REVERSE TANK
.jpeg)

Imagine stepping into the shoes of a venture capitalist, where the power to make or break a business rests entirely in your hands. Every number, every market projection, every word of the entrepreneur pitching before you could be the deciding factor in a multi-million rupee deal. Welcome to Reverse Tank—a game-changing competition that turned the conventional investment pitch model on its head.
Traditionally, in competitions like Shark Tank, entrepreneurs passionately pitch their ideas to investors, hoping to secure funding. But in Reverse Tank, the roles were reversed—startups came in, presenting their business ideas, and it was the participants who had the ultimate say. Acting as investors, they had to carefully scrutinize business models, evaluate risk factors, and determine how much of their assigned capital they were willing to invest. The stakes were high—not only did they need to make sound financial decisions, but they also had to defend those decisions in front of an expert.
This competition wasn’t just about throwing money at promising ventures—it was a battle of wits, strategy, and foresight. Every participant had a predefined portfolio dictating their available capital and investment focus, mirroring real-world constraints. The challenge here was to make calculated investments that could yield long-term returns while avoiding potential financial pitfalls. But the real test came the next day when they had to justify their investment choices before a seasoned venture capitalist, standing by their decisions in a high-pressure environment where one miscalculation could unravel their entire strategy.